Font Size: A A A
Schedule for free consultation:931-218-7800
Contact us

How Courts Address Undue Influence in Tennessee Wills

Back to Will Contest Attorneys

In Tennessee, a will may be set aside if it was created because of undue influence. Undue influence occurs when someone pressures or manipulates a person making a will so strongly that the will reflects the influencer’s wishes instead of the testator’s own. Courts often look for a relationship of trust and suspicious circumstances surrounding the preparation of the will to decide whether undue influence occurred. 

Why Undue Influence Is One of the Most Common Reasons Wills Are Challenged 

When a loved one dies, families expect the will to reflect that person’s genuine wishes about how their property should be distributed. Sometimes, however, the terms of a will raise serious questions. A longtime child may suddenly be disinherited, a new caregiver or recent acquaintance may inherit a large portion of the estate, or a late-in-life will may look dramatically different from prior estate plans.​ 

Tennessee law addresses this concern through the doctrine of undue influence. A will may be invalid if another person exercised such control or pressure over the testator that the document no longer represents the testator’s own wishes. These disputes frequently arise in situations involving caregivers, adult children managing finances, close companions, or others who occupy positions of trust.  

Because direct evidence of coercion is rare, courts usually examine the surrounding relationships and circumstances to determine whether the will reflects the testator’s independent judgment or the influence of another person. 

Understanding how Tennessee courts evaluate undue influence can help families recognize potential problems, decide whether a will contest may be appropriate, and see how judges analyze these cases. 

Important Points About Undue Influence in Tennessee 

  • Undue influence happens when someone pressures or manipulates a person making a will so strongly that the will reflects the influencer’s wishes instead of the testator’s true intentions. 
  • Courts often look closely at relationships of trust, such as when a caregiver or family member controls finances, holds a power of attorney, or manages daily care. 
  • Judges also examine warning signs surrounding the preparation of the will, including declining health, isolation from family, or a beneficiary’s major role in arranging the will and willsigning. 
  • If a trusted person receives a large benefit under a will and suspicious circumstances surround its creation, the court may require that person to explain why the will was fair and truly reflected the testator’s wishes. 
  • Evidence in these cases often includes medical and financial records, testimony from family members, and statements from the lawyer who prepared the will. 
  • No single warning sign proves undue influence. Tennessee courts look at the entire situation to decide whether the will reflects the testator’s independent decisions. 

How Tennessee Law Defines Undue Influence 

Under Tennessee law, undue influence occurs when a person pressures or controls someone making a will in a way that overcomes the testator’s free choice. When this happens, the will may reflect the wishes of the influencer rather than the true intentions of the person making the will. 

The central issue in these cases is whether the person making the will was acting independently when the document was signed. If another person’s pressure or control effectively replaced the testator’s own judgment, the will may be invalid. 

Because these situations often develop gradually and occur in private, courts rarely see direct proof such as threats or explicit demands. Instead, they look closely at the surrounding circumstances to determine whether improper influence occurred. 

The Focus Is on the Testator’s Free Choice 

A key principle of Tennessee law is that individuals generally have the right to leave their property however they choose. A will does not become invalid simply because: 

  • one child receives more than another 
  • a friend or caregiver receives a gift 
  • family members believe the distribution is unfair 

Courts do not invalidate wills simply because relatives disagree with the outcome. The law protects a person’s freedom to distribute their property as they see fit. 

The real question is whether the will reflects the testator’s independent decision. 

If the testator understood what they were doing and made the decision freely, the will is usually valid, even if the result surprises family members. 

Why Direct Evidence Is Rare 

Undue influence almost never happens in an obvious or dramatic way. Instead, it often develops over time. 

A person may slowly gain control over the testator’s daily life, finances, or access to other people. The influencer may begin speaking for the testator, arranging appointments, blocking visitors, or becoming involved in major decisions. 

Because these interactions usually occur behind closed doors, there are rarely witnesses who can testify about explicit pressure. 

For that reason, courts allow undue influence to be proven through circumstantial evidence, meaning the surrounding facts and patterns of behavior. 

Courts Look at the Entire Situation 

When deciding whether undue influence occurred, courts evaluate the full context surrounding the will. This may include: 

  • the relationship between the testator and the beneficiary 
  • the testator’s physical and mental condition 
  • who was involved in arranging the will 
  • whether the will represents a sharp departure from earlier plans 

No single fact automatically proves undue influence. Instead, courts consider how the different pieces of evidence fit together. 

Confidential Relationships: When One Person Holds the Power 

A central concept in many undue influence cases is the confidential relationship.  

A confidential relationship exists when one person places a high level of trust in another and relies on them for help with important decisions, including finances and legal matters. Because of that trust and reliance, the other person may gain significant influence over the individual’s finances, daily life, or personal affairs. 

These situations often arise when an older or vulnerable person begins relying heavily on someone else for assistance. 

Common Examples of Confidential Relationships 

Confidential relationships can appear in many forms. Some of the most common examples in will contest cases in Tennessee include: 

  • An adult child who manages a parent’s finances or holds a power of attorney 
  • A caregiver who assists with medications, transportation, or daily care 
  • A trusted friend or companion who becomes the primary decision-maker 
  • A family member who takes control of bank accounts or financial records 

In many of these situations, the person providing help may also gain the ability to influence important decisions, including decisions about estate planning. 

Why These Relationships Matter in Will Contests 

Confidential relationships are not automatically improper. In fact, many families depend on trusted relatives or caregivers to help aging parents manage their affairs. 

However, when someone in this position receives a large benefit under a will, courts may examine the situation more closely. 

The concern is that a person who controls access to finances, medical care, or daily life may also have the ability to shape or direct estate planning decisions. 

Power of Attorney Situations 

One situation that often receives close attention from courts is when a beneficiary holds a power of attorney for the person making the will. 

A power of attorney allows one person to make financial or legal decisions on behalf of another. Because this authority can provide significant control over money and property, it may place the agent in a position where influence becomes possible. 

If a person with this type of authority later receives a substantial inheritance, courts may carefully examine whether the will was created independently. In some cases, this combination can help trigger a legal presumption of undue influence that the beneficiary must then rebut. 

Confidential Relationships Are Only One Part of the Analysis 

Even when a confidential relationship exists, that fact alone does not invalidate a will. Courts usually look for additional warning signs surrounding the preparation of the will. Serious concerns about undue influence usually arise when those circumstances are combined with a relationship of trust. 

The next section explains the types of suspicious circumstances courts commonly examine when evaluating whether a will may have been improperly influenced. 

Suspicious Circumstances: Red Flags Courts Look At 

When courts evaluate whether undue influence may have occurred, they often look for suspicious circumstances surrounding the preparation of the will. These circumstances do not automatically prove wrongdoing, but they may raise concerns about whether the will truly reflects the testator’s independent wishes. 

Instead of relying on a single fact, courts usually consider a combination of warning signs that together suggest the possibility of improper influence. 

Declining Physical or Mental Health 

One factor courts frequently examine is the testator’s physical or mental condition at the time the will was created. 

Serious illness, memory problems, confusion, or cognitive decline can make a person more vulnerable to pressure from others. When a will is signed during a period of declining health, courts may look more carefully at the surrounding circumstances to determine whether the decision was truly independent. 

This does not mean that someone in poor health cannot create a valid will. However, a weakened condition may make it easier for another person to influence important decisions. 

Involvement in Preparing the Will 

Courts also look at whether the person benefiting from the will was actively involved in arranging or preparing it. 

Examples of concerning involvement may include situations where a beneficiary: 

  • selects or contacts the lawyer who prepares the will 
  • drives the testator to meetings and speaks on their behalf 
  • participates in discussions about how property should be distributed 
  • remains present during the will signing  
  • sits in on conversations that would normally occur privately between the lawyer and the client 

When a beneficiary plays a significant role in these steps, courts may question whether the testator’s wishes were formed independently. 

Major Changes to Prior Estate Plans 

Another factor courts often consider is whether the will represents a sharp departure from the testator’s earlier estate plans or long-standing intentions. 

For example, concerns may arise if: 

  • close family members are suddenly removed from the will 
  • a new acquaintance receives a large portion of the estate 
  • the distribution of assets changes dramatically from prior wills 

Unexpected changes alone do not prove undue influence. People have the right to change their estate plans. However, when dramatic changes occur under suspicious circumstances, courts may examine the situation more closely. 

Isolation from Family or Long-Time Friends 

Isolation can also play a role in undue influence cases. 

If a person begins limiting the testator’s contact with family members, friends, or advisors, it may create an environment where influence becomes easier. Courts sometimes examine whether others were prevented from visiting, communicating, or discussing financial matters with the testator. 

Isolation alone does not establish undue influence, but it may contribute to a broader pattern of concerning behavior. 

Courts Look at the Total Picture 

No single suspicious circumstance automatically proves undue influence. Tennessee courts evaluate the entire situation, considering how different facts and relationships interact with one another. 

When multiple warning signs appear together, especially when combined with a confidential relationship, courts may scrutinize the will more closely to determine whether it truly reflects the testator’s independent intentions. 

When the Law Presumes Undue Influence 

In many will contests, the person challenging the will must prove that undue influence occurred. However, Tennessee law recognizes that direct proof of influence is often difficult to obtain, so courts may sometimes apply a presumption of undue influence. A presumption means the court may begin with the assumption that improper influence occurred unless the person benefiting from the will can show otherwise.​ 

How the Presumption Arises 

This presumption may arise when two important factors appear together:​ 

  • A confidential relationship existed between the testator and the beneficiary. 
  • The beneficiary received a significant benefit under the will, and suspicious circumstances surround the preparation of the document. 

When these elements appear together, courts may become concerned that the person in the position of trust had the opportunity to improperly influence the testator’s decisions. At that point, the burden may shift to the person benefiting from the will to explain why the will should still be considered valid.​ 

What Burden Shifting Means 

When the presumption of undue influence applies, the focus of the case changes. Instead of the challenger having to prove improper influence step by step, the person who benefited from the will must demonstrate with clear and convincing evidence that the will was created fairly and independently.​ 

In practical terms, this means the beneficiary may need to present evidence showing that the testator:​ 

  • understood the terms of the will 
  • made the decision voluntarily 
  • was not controlled or pressured by others 
  • had independent legal counsel or advice 

This shift in burden can be an important turning point in a will contest because it requires the beneficiary to provide a convincing explanation for how the will was created.​ 

The Presumption Does Not Automatically Invalidate the Will 

Even when a presumption of undue influence arises, the will is not automatically invalid. The person benefiting from the will still has an opportunity to show that the testator acted freely and that the estate plan reflects the testator’s genuine wishes.​ 

Rebutting the Presumption of Undue Influence 

Even when circumstances raise concerns about undue influence, the will is not automatically set aside. The person benefiting from the will still has the opportunity to show that the testator made the decision freely and independently. Courts look for evidence that the will reflects the testator’s own wishes and that the beneficiary did not control or pressure the decision.​ 

Independent Legal Advice 

One of the strongest ways to show that a will was created independently is evidence that the testator received independent legal advice. This often means the testator met privately with an attorney who:​ 

  • discussed the testator’s intentions 
  • explained how the will would distribute property 
  • confirmed that the testator understood the consequences of the document 

When the lawyer communicates directly with the testator without the beneficiary present, it can help demonstrate that the decisions reflected the testator’s own wishes.​ 

Evidence the Testator Acted Independently 

Courts may also consider whether the testator appeared to be acting independently when the will was created. Evidence may include testimony that the testator:​ 

  • clearly explained why certain individuals were included or excluded 
  • had long expressed a desire to benefit the person receiving the inheritance 
  • continued making personal and financial decisions without outside control 

These facts may suggest that the will reflects a deliberate decision rather than improper influence.​ 

Testimony from Neutral Witnesses 

Another important source of evidence may come from neutral witnesses who observed the testator during the time the will was prepared. This can include testimony from:​ 

  • the attorney who drafted the will 
  • the witnesses who observed the will signing 
  • friends, neighbors, or advisors who interacted with the testator 

These individuals may provide insight into whether the testator appeared confident, aware of their decisions, and free from pressure.​ 

Courts Evaluate the Evidence as a Whole 

No single piece of evidence automatically resolves an undue influence claim. Courts look at the entire body of evidence when deciding whether the presumption has been overcome. If the evidence shows that the testator understood the will and made the decision independently, the court may uphold the will even if suspicious circumstances were present.​ 

Types of Evidence Used in Undue Influence Cases 

Undue influence cases are usually decided based on the overall pattern of documents, testimony, and circumstances rather than a single piece of proof. Because direct evidence of pressure is rare, Tennessee courts look closely at several different types of evidence to understand what was happening around the time the will was created.​ 

Medical Records and Health Information 

Medical records often play a central role in showing the testator’s physical and mental condition. These records may reveal diagnoses such as dementia, cognitive impairment, depression, serious illness, or medications that could affect memory, judgment, or independence.​ 

Doctors, nurses, or other healthcare providers may also testify about whether the testator appeared confused, forgetful, or easily influenced during the period when the will was made. This does not automatically prove undue influence, but it helps the court understand how vulnerable the person may have been.​ 

Testimony from the Drafting Attorney and Witnesses 

The attorney who prepared the will is often one of the most important witnesses in an undue influence case. Courts may ask the lawyer about:​ 

  • who contacted the attorney to set up the appointment 
  • whether the testator met with the lawyer alone or with someone else present 
  • how clearly the testator described their wishes 
  • whether the attorney saw any signs of pressure, confusion, or control 

Witnesses who observed the will signing may also testify about how the testator behaved, whether they seemed to understand the document, and who else was present during the signing.​ 

Financial Records and Control of Assets 

Financial records can help show whether someone gained unusual control over the testator’s money or property before the will was changed. Courts may look at:​ 

  • who had access to bank accounts or credit cards 
  • whether the beneficiary was added to accounts or titles shortly before the new will 
  • whether there were unexplained withdrawals, transfers, or gifts 

These records can support or undermine claims that a beneficiary was in a position to influence decisions about the estate.​ 

Communications, Notes, and Prior Estate Planning Documents 

Courts may also consider letters, emails, text messages, recordings, and notes that shed light on the testator’s relationships and intentions. Prior wills, trusts, or beneficiary designations can show how the estate plan changed over time and whether the contested will is a sharp break from longstanding plans.​ 

These materials can help the court decide whether the final will is consistent with what the testator had been saying for years, or whether it appears to reflect someone else’s agenda.​ 

Testimony from Family Members, Friends, and Caregivers 

Finally, testimony from people who spent time with the testator can be important. Family members, friends, neighbors, and caregivers may describe:​ 

  • changes in the testator’s health, memory, or personality 
  • whether the beneficiary began to control access, phone calls, or visits 
  • whether the testator ever expressed fear, pressure, or regret about changes to the will 

Courts evaluate all of this evidence together to determine whether the will represents the testator’s true wishes or the result of someone else’s influence.​ 

Example: How a Tennessee Court Viewed Undue Influence in a Caregiver Case 

Although many undue influence claims arise in will contests, Tennessee courts apply the same general principles in other disputes involving transfers of property. 

In one case our firm handled in 2024, the estate of an older gentleman sought to recover substantial assets—including two houses, vehicles, personal property, and a large amount of cash—that he had transferred to a caregiver he had come to trust and rely on. 

At trial, the court determined that a confidential relationship existed because the man depended heavily on the caregiver and placed significant trust in her. Most of the evidence of undue influence was circumstantial, but it included text messages, recordings, medical records, and bank records showing the caregiver’s growing control over his daily life and finances. 

Because the evidence showed both a confidential relationship and suspicious circumstances, the burden shifted to the caregiver to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the transfers were fair and reflected his independent decisions. 

After a trial in Chancery Court, the judge ultimately entered a judgment of approximately $1.5 million in favor of the estate, finding that the caregiver had wrongfully influenced the elderly gentleman for her own financial benefit. 

Cases like this illustrate how courts evaluate undue influence claims. Judges often examine relationships of trust, patterns of behavior, and detailed records to determine whether a person’s free will has been overpowered. In the will-contest setting, courts look at many of the same types of relationships and evidence when deciding whether a will reflects the testator’s true intentions. 

What to Do If You Suspect Undue Influence 

If you are worried that a Tennessee will or estate plan may reflect someone else’s wishes instead of your loved one’s, it is important to be careful and deliberate about your next steps. Acting impulsively can sometimes damage relationships or make it harder to prove what happened.​ 

Practical steps to consider include:​ 

  • Avoid moving assets or confronting the beneficiary about wrongdoing. Removing property, changing locks, or sending accusatory messages can complicate both the probate process and any later court case. 
  • Gather key documents and basic information. Try to obtain copies of the current will, any prior wills or estate planning documents, and basic medical information from around the time the will was signed. A simple timeline noting changes in health, relationships, and finances can also be very useful.​ 
  • Make a list of potential witnesses and records. Think about doctors, nurses, caregivers, neighbors, and friends who saw your loved one regularly, as well as places where important records may be found, such as banks or medical offices.​ 
  • Speak with a Tennessee probate and estate litigation attorney. An attorney can evaluate whether the facts you describe are consistent with undue influence, advise you about standing and deadlines, and explain what evidence would be most important to preserve.​ 

A consultation in this situation can help you understand whether Tennessee law is likely to recognize your circumstances as undue influence, whether you have the legal ability to bring a claim on behalf of yourself or the estate, and what evidence should be preserved early to protect your options. 

Frequently Asked Questions About Undue Influence in Tennessee

A confidential relationship exists when one person places significant trust in another and depends on them for help with important matters such as finances, medical care, or daily living. Examples often include a person holding a power of attorney, managing financial accounts, or serving as a primary caregiver. 

No. Tennessee law generally allows individuals to distribute their property however they choose. A will is not invalid simply because family members disagree with the distribution. The key issue is whether the will reflects the testator’s free and independent decision. 

Yes. A Tennessee court can invalidate a will if the evidence shows that it was the result of undue influence. This occurs when another person’s pressure or control overcomes the testator’s free will and causes the will to reflect the influencer’s wishes rather than the testator’s own intentions. 

When a court determines that undue influence affected the creation of a will, the will may be set aside. In many cases, the court will then look to an earlier valid will. If no prior will exists, the estate may instead be distributed according to Tennessee’s intestacy laws. 

Evidence may include medical records, financial records, communications such as text messages or emails, testimony from witnesses, and records showing who arranged or participated in the preparation of the will. 

Undue influence cases can be challenging because direct proof is rare and the pressure often occurs in private with no witnesses. For that reason, courts rely on circumstantial evidence, such as changes in relationships, declining health, control over finances, and involvement in preparing the will. In some situations, the law may shift the burden of proof if a trusted person receives a significant benefit under suspicious circumstances.  

When that happens, the person benefiting from the will must show by clear and convincing evidence that the will was created fairly and independently. Every case depends heavily on its specific facts, and detailed records, witness testimony, and a clear timeline of events often play an important role. 

Yes. A caregiver, family member, or trusted companion may gradually gain influence over an elderly person, especially when that person becomes more dependent on others for help with finances, medical care, or daily living. If that influence becomes strong enough to override the person’s independent judgment, Tennessee law may treat it as undue influence. 

Lack of mental capacity focuses on whether the person making the will understood what they were doing at the time the will was signed. Undue influence focuses on whether another person pressured or manipulated the testator into making decisions they would not have made independently. A person may have legal capacity to make a will but still be vulnerable to undue influence from someone in a position of trust. 

Yes. Tennessee courts can apply undue influence principles to lifetime transfers, such as deeds, adding someone to bank accounts, or large gifts made before death. When a person in a position of trust receives significant assets under suspicious circumstances, the estate may later be able to challenge those transactions based on undue influence, even if the will itself is not at issue. 

Concerned About Undue Influence? Speak With an Experienced Attorney Today

Undue influence is one of the most fact-intensive and emotionally difficult issues in Tennessee estate litigation. When a person in a position of trust gains control over an elderly or vulnerable individual’s daily life, finances, or medical decisions, even well-intentioned assistance can sometimes cross the line into pressure that overpowers the testator’s free will. 

For that reason, Tennessee courts carefully examine relationships of trust, suspicious circumstances surrounding the preparation of a will, and the evidence showing who was truly making the decisions. The goal is to determine whether the will reflects the testator’s independent wishes or the influence of another person. 

If you recognize patterns such as sudden control over finances, isolation from family, dramatic changes in an estate plan, or a beneficiary playing a major role in arranging the will, it may be worth asking whether undue influence played a role. Preserving records such as medical information, financial documents, communications, and witness accounts can be important while those records are still available. 

Because every situation depends heavily on its specific facts, obtaining legal guidance can help clarify the available options. If you believe a loved one may have been pressured or manipulated into changing their will, the attorneys at Crow Estate Planning & Probate, PLC can help evaluate the situation. Our firm regularly represents families in Tennessee will contests and undue influence cases. We can review the available records, analyze the surrounding circumstances, and advise you on whether the law may allow the will or asset transfers to be challenged. If you would like to discuss your situation, contact Crow Estate Planning & Probate, PLC to schedule a consultation. 

Contact Us Call Our Office
A high-angle, wide-view landscape of a city skyline with various commercial buildings and rooftops during the day.

Get in Touch With Us

Please fill out the form and someone will be in contact with you as soon as possible.

    In-PersonVideo CallTelephone Call

    Never share sensitive information (credit card numbers, social security numbers, passwords) through this form.. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Latest News

    View all posts
    A headshot of Julia Mynhier, the head of marketing for Crow Estate Planning & Probate, posing outdoors near a tree. Julia Mynhier

    Attorney Scott Grant Joins Crow Estate Planning…

    Our team is excited to announce that we are officially expanding to […]

    04/27/26
    Headshot of attorney & owner of Crow Estate Planning & Probate, John Crow sitting in front of a wooden glass door in a suit. John Crow

    How to Revoke a Will in Tennessee

    In Tennessee, you can revoke a will at any time, but if […]

    04/13/26
    Headshot of attorney & owner of Crow Estate Planning & Probate, John Crow sitting in front of a wooden glass door in a suit. John Crow

    Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Tennessee: What…

    Whether you are watching an executor play favorites with your parent’s estate, […]

    04/10/26
    Headshot of Crow Estate Planning & Probate attorney Thomas Steelman in a suit sitting outside the front of a building. Thomas Steelman

    Prenuptial Agreements in Tennessee: A Planning Tool,…

    A prenuptial agreement is not a sign that you distrust your future […]

    03/30/26
    Aerial image of the city of Clarksville, TN.

    Hear From Our Clients

    Krystal Rivas

    I had a great experience with Crow Estate Planning & Probate! They made a complicated process feel simple, took the time to explain everything clearly, and were incredibly professional from start to finish. I felt supported and confident every step of the way. Highly recommend!

    Emily Richardson

    I had a great experience working with Crow Estate Planning and Probate. They made the entire process of writing my will feel simple, organized, and far less overwhelming than I expected. From start to finish, they were professional, patient, and very knowledgeable. They took the time to clearly explain everything and made sure all of my questions were answered, which gave me a lot of peace of mind. I truly appreciated how smooth and efficient the process was, while still feeling very personal and thorough. I would highly recommend them to anyone looking for help with estate planning!

    Steve Baker

    I can’t say enough about Crow Estate Planning & Probate. They did an excellent job explaining and drafting my estate plan. I would highly recommend.

    David Sweatt

    Professional above all expectations. Every question asked answered to understanding. Took time to tailor my request to the exact detail. Documents were explained to the details there in before signing. Super friendly and not showing sign of disconcerting attitude. I respect this firm and they have my “complete” trust.

    Ute Bennett

    We are very happy with the services provided and will recommend to family and friends.

    Donald Hutcherson

    The Crow law firm was absolutely wonderful from start to finish.the entire team was professional, knowledgeable and courteous. Above all they were absolutely caring in helping me through a difficult time. I highly recommend this law firm.all my needs were taken care of and were handled in a timely manner…I am forever grateful.

    Bill Boyd

    Where do I begin? I truly can’t say enough nice things about Crow Estate Planning & Probate and Alexandra Hulme, without her and everyone around her, I can truly say I don’t know where I would be today. Like many after losing my mother, I was lost, in a dark place and things weren’t happening how my mother had planned in her trust and will. Before waiting too long, I retained Alexandra’s services and she took me through the process step-by-step. Something that I never thought I could afford or I’d have to do. She knew I wasn’t asking her to do anything more than complete my mother’s last wishes. She did just that. They did it because they’re passionate about what they do. Communication was A+. She never left me hanging. I know family means a lot to her/them. I am indebted to her and these people forever. If you need help, call her today. I promise you won’t be disappointed. Thank you Alexandra from the bottom of my heart.
     
     

    Travis Henry

    I was referred to John by a fellow real estate investor when I needed guidance on structuring a couple of LLCs. From the start, he made the process incredibly smooth and straightforward. John was consistently responsive, thorough in his explanations, and showed a genuine commitment to getting everything completed on time—even working late to accommodate my schedule while I was operating from Hawaii, several time zones away. His mix of professionalism, attention to detail, and approachable demeanor made the entire experience seamless. I’m grateful to have him as a resource and wouldn’t hesitate to recommend him to anyone looking for a reliable and knowledgeable attorney.
     
     
     

    Andre Christophe

    Bridget and Thomas were very professional and knowledgeable in responding to my needs. Also, they were very organized and easy to work with. 
     
     
     

    Allen Moser

    This firm has done several things for me and real estate clients. Most recently setting up a TIST (Tennessee Investment Services Trust). And redoing my Will, Medical Power of Attorney, and Healthcare Directive. Appreciated their understanding of all of the intricacies of each document. Their timely communication and prompt service.
     
     
     

    Our Locations

    Clarksville

    512 Madison St Suite A, Clarksville, TN 37040

    931-218-7800
    Map icon indicating the office locations for Crow Estate Planning and Probate throughout Tennessee and Kentucky areas. Get directions
    Nashville

    1503 16th Ave S,
    Nashville, TN 37212

    615-558-8002
    Map icon indicating the office locations for Crow Estate Planning and Probate throughout Tennessee and Kentucky areas. Get directions
    Franklin

    321 Billingsly Court Suite 20, Franklin, TN 37067

    (615) 996-1400
    Map icon indicating the office locations for Crow Estate Planning and Probate throughout Tennessee and Kentucky areas. Get directions
    Hopkinsville

    203 E 9th St,
    Hopkinsville, KY, 42240

    270-569-0006
    A solid purple silhouette of the state of Kentucky, used to indicate the law firm's legal services in that region. Get directions
    Springfield

    719 S Main St Suite 110, Springfield, TN, 37172

    615-914-2184
    Map icon indicating the office locations for Crow Estate Planning and Probate throughout Tennessee and Kentucky areas. Get directions
    Chattanooga

    736 Georgia Ave Suite 504, Chattanooga, TN 37402

    (423) 709-5401
    Map icon indicating the office locations for Crow Estate Planning and Probate throughout Tennessee and Kentucky areas. Get directions