Font Size: A A A
Schedule for free consultation:931-218-7800
Contact us

Lack of Capacity in Tennessee Will Contests

Back to Will Contest Attorneys

In Tennessee, a will can be thrown out if the person who signed it did not have the mental ability to understand what they were doing at the time they signed it. 

To have the needed “capacity,” the person making the will must be able to: 

  • understand that they are signing a will 
  • have a general sense of what they own 
  • recognize the people who would normally expect to receive their property 
  • understand how the will divides their property among those people 

Tennessee law starts by assuming an adult has the capacity to make a will. The person who challenges the will has the burden to prove that the person who signed it did not have that mental capacity at the time of signing. 

Key Takeaways 
  • In Tennessee, a will can be set aside if the person who signed it did not have the mental capacity to understand what they were doing at the time of signing. 
  • Capacity means the person understands that they are making a will, what they generally own, who would normally receive their property, and how the will divides their assets. 
  • Courts do not treat age, illness, dementia, or memory problems alone as proof of lack of capacity; what matters is the person’s actual mental state when the will was signed. 
  • Tennessee law presumes adults have capacity, so the person challenging the will must bring enough evidence to overcome that presumption. 
  • Most capacity disputes are won or lost on detailed evidence from medical records and witnesses who saw the person around the time the will was signed. 
Why This Matters 

Questions about mental capacity are one of the most common reasons wills are challenged in Tennessee. These disputes often come up when: 

  • an older adult signs a new will late in life 
  • someone has been diagnosed with dementia or memory problems 
  • a longstanding estate plan suddenly changes 
  • a caregiver, neighbor, or new friend becomes a major beneficiary 

In these situations, families often wonder whether the will truly reflects their loved one’s wishes or whether they lacked the mental ability to understand what they were doing. Tennessee law does not require perfect mental health, but it does require that, at the time of signing, the person has enough mental clarity to understand the nature of the will and what it will do. 

The rest of this article walks through how Tennessee courts look at capacity, what kinds of evidence matter, and how capacity issues are handled in a will contest. 

What Testamentary Capacity Means in Tennessee 

In Tennessee, testamentary capacity is a specific legal standard: did your loved one understand what they were doing when they signed their will? They do not need a perfect memory or the ability to handle complicated finances to meet this standard.​ 

At the time they signed the will, they must be able to: 

  • realize they are signing a will that will control who gets their property after they die​ 
  • have a general sense of what they own, even if they cannot list every account or item​ 
  • recognize the people who would normally expect to inherit, such as a spouse, children, or other close family​ 
  • understand, in a basic way, who is receiving their property under the will​ 

Someone can still meet this standard even if they have: 

  • memory problems​ 
  • a diagnosis like dementia​ 
  • periods of confusion or “bad days”​ 
  • a need for help with everyday tasks​ 

What the court cares about is whether, at the time of signing, your loved one could put together a clear, basic picture of their property, their family, and the choices they were making in the will, not whether they were perfectly healthy in every respect. 

The Critical Moment: Capacity at Signing 

When a Tennessee court looks at capacity, it is taking a mental “snapshot” of your loved one at the moment they signed the will. The question is whether they had enough mental clarity at that specific moment to understand what they were doing. 

This means that even if someone was experiencing cognitive decline, or had been diagnosed with dementia, the will can still be valid if they had a moment of sufficient clarity when it was signed. 

To answer that question, courts consider evidence from around the time of the signing, such as: 

  • medical records from close in time to when the will was signed 
  • testimony from family, friends, or caregivers who saw your loved one around that date 
  • the observations of the lawyer who prepared the will 
  • statements from the witnesses who were in the room during the signing 

Events that are far in time from the signing often matter less. A hospitalization months earlier may not carry much weight without proof that the problems continued through the signing. Short episodes of confusion may also not be enough unless they were happening when the will was actually signed. 

Because of this “snapshot” rule, many cases are decided on very specific details about your loved one’s condition in the days, and sometimes even the hours, surrounding the signing, rather than on more dramatic events that occurred weeks or months before or after. 

Old Age, Illness, and Dementia: Why They Are Not Enough 

Many valid wills in Tennessee are signed by people who are elderly, seriously ill, or living with conditions like dementia. The law does not require someone to be in perfect health to make a will. It only requires that, at the time of signing, they understand what they are doing and why. 

This means that a diagnosis alone is not enough to invalidate a will. Even someone with dementia or memory loss may still have the legal capacity to sign a valid will. 

Many individuals with cognitive decline still have periods of clarity when they can understand the basic elements of a will, including what they own, who their family members are, and how their property is being distributed. 

Physical condition, by itself, also does not decide the issue. A person may be bedridden, require assistance with daily activities, or be in very poor health and still have the mental clarity required to make a will. 

Because of this, Tennessee courts focus less on labels like “elderly,” “frail,” or “dementia,” and more on what your loved one could actually understand and decide at the time the will was signed. 

Presumption of Capacity and Burden of Proof 

In Tennessee, the law starts with this assumption: an adult is mentally capable of making a will. That means the default position in any will contest is that the will is valid and that your loved one had capacity when they signed it. 

Because of this starting point, the person who challenges the will has the job of proving that the person who signed it did not have the mental capacity required at the time of signing. This is a real hurdle. It is not enough to show that your loved one: 

  • was older 
  • had health problems 
  • had memory issues 
  • had a diagnosis like dementia 

To succeed, the challenger must bring evidence that, at the time the will was signed, your loved one could not meet the legal standard for testamentary capacity. Courts are cautious about throwing out a will without strong proof. 

There is an important idea behind this: people have the right to decide what happens to their property, even if others think their decisions are unfair or unwise. Because of that, claims about lack of capacity usually require detailed, wellsupported evidence, and many cases turn on how believable the witnesses are and how strong the proof is. 

How Lack of Testamentary Capacity Is Proven in a Tennessee Will Contest 

Proving lack of testamentary capacity in Tennessee is not based on a diagnosis alone. These cases are built by combining different types of evidence to show whether the testator met the legal standard for capacity at the time of signing. 

In most situations, the outcome depends on whether the evidence tells a clear and consistent story about the testator’s mental state. 

Courts look at the full picture, including medical history, witness observations, and the circumstances surrounding the execution of the will. The key question is whether all of that evidence, taken together, shows the testator could not meet the legal standard for capacity. 

Several types of evidence are commonly used: 

  • medical records and physician testimony describing the testator’s mental condition 
  • observations from family members, friends, or caregivers who interacted with the testator around the time of the signing 
  • the testimony of the attorney who prepared the will and the witnesses who observed its execution 

In practice, these cases often involve detailed discovery. Medical records are closely analyzed, doctors and caregivers may be deposed, and the drafting attorney is frequently a key witness. Many cases ultimately turn on witness credibility and how well the evidence fits together. 

Because of this, determining whether a valid claim exists usually requires more than suspicion. It requires evidence showing the testator did not meet the legal standard for capacity at the time of signing.  

Medical Evidence and Health Conditions 

In Tennessee will contests, medical records and doctor testimony often play a major role in deciding whether someone had the mental capacity to sign a will.  

Courts look at diagnoses like: 

  • Alzheimer’s disease 
  • other forms of dementia 
  • stroke 
  • brain injury 
  • serious psychiatric illness 
  • extreme intoxication 
  • other conditions that could affect clear thinking 

But a diagnosis alone is rarely enough. What matters is what the records show about the person’s actual ability to understand their actions around the time the will was signed. 

Medical records can be helpful when they: 

  • are close in time to the signing, rather than months or years away 
  • describe orientation (knowing the date, place, and people around them) 
  • show whether the person could follow conversation, answer questions coherently, or remember information 
  • include formal cognitive testing or clear physician impressions about decisionmaking ability 

In many cases, lawyers use treating doctors or expert witnesses to explain these records and connect them to the legal standard for testamentary capacity.  

Sometimes medical proof is strong enough to show the person likely did not understand what they were doing when they signed the will. In other circumstances, courts find that the records are too remote in time, speak only to managing daytoday affairs, or simply are not specific enough about capacity to make or understand a will. 

Testimony from Family, Friends, and Caregivers 

In Tennessee will contests, what family members, friends, and caregivers see in everyday life can be powerful evidence on mental capacity. Courts allow nonexperts (lay witnesses) to testify about what they personally observed, such as the person’s conversations, behavior, memory, and ability to handle simple decisions, as long as they describe specific facts, not just “I think she was incompetent.” 

Helpful testimony usually includes details such as: 

  • the condition of the person’s short and long term memory  
  • whether the person recognized close family and remembered relationships 
  • how they handled ordinary conversations and whether they could follow along and respond appropriately 
  • examples of confusion about time, place, or people, or calling loved ones by the wrong name 
  • incidents where they could not understand or remember simple information, or could not manage basic tasks they used to handle 

Courts also pay attention to who is testifying and whether they seem biased. Testimony from disinterested witnesses, such as longtime friends, neighbors, or unrelated caregivers, can sometimes carry more weight than the views of a family member who stands to gain or lose financially in the case. 

By contrast, blanket statements such as “she never had capacity” or “he was always fine,” without concrete examples, are often given little weight. Judges and juries tend to trust detailed, fact based descriptions over broad conclusions. 

Testimony from the Drafting Attorney and Signing Witnesses 

In many Tennessee will contests, the lawyer who prepared the will and the people who watched it being signed become important witnesses. Courts often give their testimony significant weight because they were in the room when the will was explained and executed. 

Typical questions for the drafting attorney and witnesses include: 

  • who contacted the attorney about preparing the will and who came to the meetings 
  • whether anyone else was present or appeared to influence the testator’s decisions 
  • whether the testator could explain, in their own words, what they wanted the will to do 
  • whether the testator appeared to understand the basic effect of the will 

If the attorney carefully discussed the plan, asked questions to check understanding and mental clarity, and saw no signs of confusion, that testimony can strongly support a finding of capacity. 

On the other hand, if the attorney did not know about serious diagnoses, asked few or no questions about mental state, or has only a vague memory of the meeting, courts may give more weight to medical records and other witnesses when deciding whether the testator truly had capacity. 

Lucid Intervals: Can Someone With Dementia Still Make a Valid Will? 

In Tennessee, a person who has dementia or another cognitive impairment can still have the legal capacity to make a will during what is called a lucid interval. A lucid interval is more than just a “good moment.” It is a period of temporary mental clarity when the person is able to understand the basic elements of the will, even if they are generally impaired at other times. 

Because of this, a will can still be valid even if the person who signed it: 

  • has been diagnosed with dementia 
  • has confusion or memory loss at other times 
  • needs help with daily activities 

The key question is the same as in any capacity case: did they have enough mental clarity at the moment they signed the will to understand what they were doing? 

Why Lucid Intervals Are Often Disputed 

Lucid interval cases are common in will contests and often heavily disputed. One side may argue that the person had a “good moment” and clearly understood the will, while the other side insists the dementia or confusion was too severe for real understanding. 

That is where timing and evidence become critical. Courts look closely at: 

  • medical records close in time to the signing 
  • observations from people who saw the person that day 
  • testimony from the lawyer who prepared the will and the witnesses who were in the room 

General statements like “they had good days and bad days” are usually not enough by themselves. Courts want specific, concrete evidence that the person was actually clear and capable when they signed. 

How Courts Evaluate a Claimed Lucid Interval 

When someone claims a lucid interval, courts focus on whether there is solid evidence of clarity at the time of signing.  

Medical and lay testimony about the person’s condition before and after the signing is admissible as long as it is not too remote, because it can shed light on their mental state at execution.  

By contrast, medical notes or witness accounts showing serious confusion or disorientation close to the signing can undercut a claim that a true lucid interval occurred. 

When Prior Insanity or Mental Impairment Changes the Burden 

Normally, Tennessee law presumes an adult has capacity, and the person challenging the will must prove otherwise. But when there is proof that the testator was legally insane or had significant mental impairment before the will was signed, the presumption is different: the law presumes that insanity or mental infirmity continues unless the condition was accidental and temporary in nature. 

In that situation, the person trying to uphold the will (the proponent) must prove that the will was signed during a genuine lucid interval and that the testator met the ordinary Tennessee standard for testamentary capacity at that time.  

The jury typically decides whether a lucid interval existed and whether any delusions affected the will’s provisions, based on all the medical and lay evidence presented. 

The Practical Reality in Dementia Cases 

In many Tennessee will contests involving dementia or other mental illness, everyone agrees the pe rson had serious cognitive issues. The real fight is over whether they had a meaningful moment of clarity when the will was signed.  

The outcome often turns on very specific details about the person’s condition on the day of signing and on how believable the witnesses and records are when presented to a judge or jury. 

Example: How Testamentary Capacity Is Proven in a Real Case 

In a recent case we tried, the decedent had five children and signed a will leaving her entire estate to just one child. This will was executed several years after she had been diagnosed with dementia. A prior will had divided her estate equally among all five children. 

As discussed above, a diagnosis of dementia alone is not enough to invalidate a will. The issue was whether she had the mental capacity to understand what she was doing at the time she signed this later will. 

In this case, however, the court found that the decedent had been diagnosed with dementia approximately five years before the will was executed. Based on that evidence, the burden shifted to the person seeking to uphold the will to prove that she was competent at the time of signing. 

They were unable to meet that burden. 

The medical evidence became the most important part of the case. 

Records from just one day before the will was signed showed that the decedent was experiencing significant mental confusion. She could not recall the day or the month, could not perform basic math, and had severely impaired short term memory. 

We presented expert testimony based on those medical records establishing that it was more likely than not that she lacked testamentary capacity at the time of execution. She also passed away within a few months of signing the will, which further supported the timeline of her decline. 

The testimony surrounding the will signing itself was mixed. 

The witnesses who were present could not recall the execution of the will. The attorney who prepared the will testified that he believed she was of sound mind, but he was not aware of her dementia diagnosis and did not ask questions to evaluate her cognitive condition in any meaningful way. 

Ultimately, the court found that the decedent lacked testamentary capacity at the time she signed the will. It was a close case, but the medical records, particularly those close in time to the execution, played a decisive role. 

What Happens If a Will Is Found Invalid for Lack of Capacity? 

If a Tennessee court determines that a will is invalid due to lack of testamentary capacity, the will is treated as though it never existed. 

The estate is then distributed under one of two alternatives: 

  • a prior valid will, if one exists 
  • Tennessee intestacy law, if there is no earlier valid will 

In many cases, this means the estate will pass to the testator’s closest family members, such as a spouse or children, under Tennessee’s intestacy statutes. 

If there was a prior will, the court may admit that earlier will to probate instead. This often results in a very different distribution than the invalidated will. 

What This Means in Practice 

Invalidating a will can significantly change who inherits the estate. 

For example: 

  • a child who was disinherited under a later will may inherit under a prior will 
  • a caregiver or non-family beneficiary may receive nothing if the will is set aside 
  • assets may be redistributed among multiple family members instead of going to a single person 

These outcomes are often the reason will contests are filed in the first place. 

Important Considerations 

Even if a will is successfully challenged, the process can involve: 

  • litigation costs such as attorney fees, expert witness fees, and cost of obtaining medical records and bank records 
  • delays in administering the estate 
  • disputes among family members 

Because of this, it is important to carefully evaluate the strength of a claim before pursuing a will contest. 

When a Capacity Challenge Is Worth Pursuing 

Not every upsetting or “unfair” will is a good candidate for a lack of capacity claim. In Tennessee, these cases make the most sense when there is both strong legal ground and enough at stake to justify the time, cost, and stress of a will contest. 

A capacity challenge may be worth exploring when: 

  • there is clear medical evidence of serious cognitive problems (for example, advanced Alzheimer’s, other dementia, brain injury, or psychiatric illness) close in time to the signing 
  • witnesses describe the testator being unable to recognize close family, follow simple conversations, or explain in their own words what the will did 
  • the will represents a drastic, unexplained change from a long standing plan that lines up with a documented decline in mental function 

On the other hand, a capacity claim is often weak where: 

  • the main concern is that the will seems unfair, but the testator still clearly understood who their family was and what they owned 
  • the only proof is mild forgetfulness or ordinary aging, without strong medical or witness evidence near the time of signing 

Families should also think about practical issues: the size of the estate, the likely cost and duration of litigation, and the emotional impact on relationships. In many cases, an initial consultation focused on the timeline, medical history, and available witnesses is the best way to decide whether a capacity claim is realistic. 

Frequently Asked Questions About Capacity in Tennessee

Testamentary capacity means the person signing the will understands that they are making a will, has a general understanding of their property, knows who would ordinarily inherit their estate, and understands how the will distributes their assets. 

No. A diagnosis by itself is not enough. Courts focus on whether your loved one met the legal standard for capacity at the moment the will was signed. Medical records and witness testimony near the time of signing are often critical. 

There is no single “magic” document that automatically proves lack of capacity. At a minimum, you usually need more than suspicion or a sense that the will is unfair. Courts look for concrete facts, such as medical records close in time to the signing that show serious confusion or cognitive impairment, and specific witness examples that the testator could not recognize close family, understand what they owned, or grasp how the will divided their property. The stronger and more detailed that evidence is, the more likely a capacity claim is to succeed. 

That pattern is common with conditions like dementia. The law looks at their mental state at the exact time of signing. A will can still be valid if it was signed during a true lucid interval, when your parent had enough clarity to understand what they were doing, even if they were more impaired at other times. 

In some situations, a court may set aside only part of a will if the lack of capacity affected specific provisions, although most cases involve challenges to the entire document. 

Usually not. Mild forgetfulness or normal aging, without more, generally is not enough to prove lack of testamentary capacity. There typically needs to be stronger evidence, such as serious confusion, inability to recognize close family, or clear medical documentation of significant cognitive impairment around the time of signing. 

A lucid interval is a period of mental clarity during which a person who is otherwise impaired is able to understand what they are doing. A will signed during a lucid interval can be valid. 

Lack of testamentary capacity focuses on whether the person could understand what they were doing when they signed the will: what a will is, what they own, who their family is, and how the will divides their property. Undue influence, by contrast, assumes the person had at least basic mental capacity but claims that someone else applied such pressure or manipulation that the will reflects the influencer’s wishes instead of the testator’s free choice. 

Yes. Many Tennessee will contests include both lack of capacity and undue influence claims. In some cases, the same facts, such as extreme dependency on a caregiver combined with cognitive decline, are used to argue that the testator both lacked capacity and was especially vulnerable to improper pressure. 

In many cases, yes. Lack of capacity requires proof that the testator did not understand the will, which can be difficult. Undue influence focuses on whether someone improperly influenced the testator, even if they had capacity. 

No. While the drafting attorney’s testimony can be extremely important, it is not controlling. Courts consider all of the evidence together, including medical records and other witness testimony. 

Yes. In Tennessee, a will is typically admitted to probate before it is ever challenged. Being admitted to probate does not prevent a will contest. 

A will contest is a separate legal action that asks the court to determine whether the will is valid. This often occurs after the will has already been filed and accepted by the probate court. 

However, there is a strict deadline. In most cases, a will contest must be filed within two years after the will is admitted to probate. If that deadline passes, you may lose your right to challenge the will. 

Putting It All Together

Capacity disputes are rarely about a single moment or a single document. They are about the overall story the evidence tells about your loved one’s mental state when the will was signed. Tennessee law gives people wide freedom to decide what happens to their property, but it also sets real limits when illness, dementia, or other impairments mean they could not understand what they were doing. 

If you are seeing medical records, witness accounts, or sudden changes in an estate plan that do not line up with your loved one’s abilities at the time, it may be worth taking a closer look. On the other hand, if the main concern is that the will feels unfair but the person still clearly understood their choices, a capacity challenge may not be the right tool. 

Because these cases are so fact-driven, small details in medical records or witness accounts can completely change the outcome. 

Talk With a Tennessee Will Contest Lawyer

If you have questions about whether a loved one had the mental capacity to sign a will, the next step is to get specific advice about your situation. An attorney who regularly handles Tennessee will contests can: 

  • review the will and any earlier estate planning documents 
  • walk through the timeline of diagnoses, hospitalizations, and key events 
  • evaluate medical records and witness information for signs that support or weaken a capacity claim 
  • explain the deadlines and procedure for contesting a will in the court where the estate is being handled 

At Crow Estate Planning & Probate, we represent families throughout Tennessee in will contests involving lack of capacity, undue influence, and other challenges to an estate plan. Our team can review your loved one’s will, the surrounding medical and factual history, and give you a clear, honest assessment of whether a capacity claim is worth pursuing or defending in your case. 

Contact Us Call Our Office
A high-angle, wide-view landscape of a city skyline with various commercial buildings and rooftops during the day.

Get in Touch With Us

Please fill out the form and someone will be in contact with you as soon as possible.

    In-PersonVideo CallTelephone Call

    Never share sensitive information (credit card numbers, social security numbers, passwords) through this form.. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Latest News

    View all posts
    A headshot of Julia Mynhier, the head of marketing for Crow Estate Planning & Probate, posing outdoors near a tree. Julia Mynhier

    Attorney Scott Grant Joins Crow Estate Planning…

    Our team is excited to announce that we are officially expanding to […]

    04/27/26
    Headshot of attorney & owner of Crow Estate Planning & Probate, John Crow sitting in front of a wooden glass door in a suit. John Crow

    How to Revoke a Will in Tennessee

    In Tennessee, you can revoke a will at any time, but if […]

    04/13/26
    Headshot of attorney & owner of Crow Estate Planning & Probate, John Crow sitting in front of a wooden glass door in a suit. John Crow

    Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Tennessee: What…

    Whether you are watching an executor play favorites with your parent’s estate, […]

    04/10/26
    Headshot of Crow Estate Planning & Probate attorney Thomas Steelman in a suit sitting outside the front of a building. Thomas Steelman

    Prenuptial Agreements in Tennessee: A Planning Tool,…

    A prenuptial agreement is not a sign that you distrust your future […]

    03/30/26
    Aerial image of the city of Clarksville, TN.

    Hear From Our Clients

    Krystal Rivas

    I had a great experience with Crow Estate Planning & Probate! They made a complicated process feel simple, took the time to explain everything clearly, and were incredibly professional from start to finish. I felt supported and confident every step of the way. Highly recommend!

    Emily Richardson

    I had a great experience working with Crow Estate Planning and Probate. They made the entire process of writing my will feel simple, organized, and far less overwhelming than I expected. From start to finish, they were professional, patient, and very knowledgeable. They took the time to clearly explain everything and made sure all of my questions were answered, which gave me a lot of peace of mind. I truly appreciated how smooth and efficient the process was, while still feeling very personal and thorough. I would highly recommend them to anyone looking for help with estate planning!

    Steve Baker

    I can’t say enough about Crow Estate Planning & Probate. They did an excellent job explaining and drafting my estate plan. I would highly recommend.

    David Sweatt

    Professional above all expectations. Every question asked answered to understanding. Took time to tailor my request to the exact detail. Documents were explained to the details there in before signing. Super friendly and not showing sign of disconcerting attitude. I respect this firm and they have my “complete” trust.

    Ute Bennett

    We are very happy with the services provided and will recommend to family and friends.

    Donald Hutcherson

    The Crow law firm was absolutely wonderful from start to finish.the entire team was professional, knowledgeable and courteous. Above all they were absolutely caring in helping me through a difficult time. I highly recommend this law firm.all my needs were taken care of and were handled in a timely manner…I am forever grateful.

    Bill Boyd

    Where do I begin? I truly can’t say enough nice things about Crow Estate Planning & Probate and Alexandra Hulme, without her and everyone around her, I can truly say I don’t know where I would be today. Like many after losing my mother, I was lost, in a dark place and things weren’t happening how my mother had planned in her trust and will. Before waiting too long, I retained Alexandra’s services and she took me through the process step-by-step. Something that I never thought I could afford or I’d have to do. She knew I wasn’t asking her to do anything more than complete my mother’s last wishes. She did just that. They did it because they’re passionate about what they do. Communication was A+. She never left me hanging. I know family means a lot to her/them. I am indebted to her and these people forever. If you need help, call her today. I promise you won’t be disappointed. Thank you Alexandra from the bottom of my heart.
     
     

    Travis Henry

    I was referred to John by a fellow real estate investor when I needed guidance on structuring a couple of LLCs. From the start, he made the process incredibly smooth and straightforward. John was consistently responsive, thorough in his explanations, and showed a genuine commitment to getting everything completed on time—even working late to accommodate my schedule while I was operating from Hawaii, several time zones away. His mix of professionalism, attention to detail, and approachable demeanor made the entire experience seamless. I’m grateful to have him as a resource and wouldn’t hesitate to recommend him to anyone looking for a reliable and knowledgeable attorney.
     
     
     

    Andre Christophe

    Bridget and Thomas were very professional and knowledgeable in responding to my needs. Also, they were very organized and easy to work with. 
     
     
     

    Allen Moser

    This firm has done several things for me and real estate clients. Most recently setting up a TIST (Tennessee Investment Services Trust). And redoing my Will, Medical Power of Attorney, and Healthcare Directive. Appreciated their understanding of all of the intricacies of each document. Their timely communication and prompt service.
     
     
     

    Our Locations

    Clarksville

    512 Madison St Suite A, Clarksville, TN 37040

    931-218-7800
    Map icon indicating the office locations for Crow Estate Planning and Probate throughout Tennessee and Kentucky areas. Get directions
    Nashville

    1503 16th Ave S,
    Nashville, TN 37212

    615-558-8002
    Map icon indicating the office locations for Crow Estate Planning and Probate throughout Tennessee and Kentucky areas. Get directions
    Franklin

    321 Billingsly Court Suite 20, Franklin, TN 37067

    (615) 996-1400
    Map icon indicating the office locations for Crow Estate Planning and Probate throughout Tennessee and Kentucky areas. Get directions
    Hopkinsville

    203 E 9th St,
    Hopkinsville, KY, 42240

    270-569-0006
    A solid purple silhouette of the state of Kentucky, used to indicate the law firm's legal services in that region. Get directions
    Springfield

    719 S Main St Suite 110, Springfield, TN, 37172

    615-914-2184
    Map icon indicating the office locations for Crow Estate Planning and Probate throughout Tennessee and Kentucky areas. Get directions
    Chattanooga

    736 Georgia Ave Suite 504, Chattanooga, TN 37402

    (423) 709-5401
    Map icon indicating the office locations for Crow Estate Planning and Probate throughout Tennessee and Kentucky areas. Get directions